This month (October 2016), the UN is holding the third of it’s global conferences on cities; previous ones were held in 1976 and 1996. The objective is to bring together government officials, industry leaders, planners, and environmental experts to discuss the future of cities around the world. The State Department is representing the US government. Increasing populations will have a major effect on urban environments and demands for services during the 21st century. I’m all for sharing ideas, identifying best practices, and making the world better; however since the UN has become the global advocate for socialism we conservatives have to look at it with a bit of skepticism. If you haven’t read their draft document it’s available on the Habitat III website.
Like UN Agenda 21 the draft has some lofty goals. They’d like cities to be clean, safe, sustainable, and provide opportunities for all (nothing wrong with that). They’d like to eliminate poverty, hunger, violence, inequality, discrimination, environmental degradation, and a list of diseases.
Like UN Agenda 21 the draft has the usual list of hypocritical goals. The UN wants equality and equal opportunity for girls and women, and an end to discrimination. We’re trying in the West, but no Muslim country will ever grant equality to women, who are often treated as less than human. Countries that stone rape victims for adultery and hang men for being gay don’t see equality as a virtue. The UN wants justice. Tell that to countries that still torture, flog, and mutilate criminals. The UN wants participatory government. Tell that to communist countries like China where speaking out might get you 12 years hard labor. The authors of this document are fully aware of these harsh and unchanging realities in totalitarian and theocratic states.
Unlike UN Agenda 21 there’s no obvious explicit demand for billions of dollars to be redistributed from developed nations to the third world but it is implicit. Countries that can’t even end their own internal conflicts aren’t going to generate the cash to build clean water systems, productive farms, modern infrastructure, and the host of services needed in a city.
Their draft items often begin with “We will …” so let’s use that to draw our “line in the sand”.
We will listen, share, and learn. We can combine past experiences with new knowledge to build better cities in the future.
We will work with the teams to identify best practices as well as chronic problem areas.
We will use new developments and best practices for our cities that will work within our legal, financial, and cultural environment.
We will work to protect our environment within current practical technology and will continue research on new technologies.
We will help other nations reach their objectives within financial reason and as long as the safety of US aid workers can be assured.
We will NOT implement any objectives that would deprive US citizens of their constitutional rights within our borders. For example, if their “eliminate all forms of violence” means gun confiscation, that’s unconstitutional here. There’s a fundamental reality that there will always be bad people who want to hurt good people and that self-defense is a fundamental human right.
We will NOT allow foreign troops operating under the UN flag to conduct any operations against US citizens within our borders. The UN is an organization, not a legitimate state, so It’s military powers are limited, or at least should be.
None of this advocates isolationism, aggression, or abandoning our allies; it’s simply sovereignty. Borders matter, and yes, I want secure borders. A nation without borders will either descend into chaos or tyranny.
The USA can work with the world without surrendering to it.